Home  /  Resources  /  Retirement Income Analysis
Retirement Planning Analysis  ·  2025 Tax Year

40 Years of Savings:
What Do You Actually Keep?

A quantitative framework for Social Security, IRA and 401(k) strategy, and the real cost of state taxation in retirement — built on actual S&P 500 returns from 1985 to 2025.

The Career Earnings Profile

This analysis models a full 40-year working career beginning in 1985 with a starting salary of $35,900 — the purchasing-power equivalent of $115,000 in today's dollars. Earnings grow at a compound annual rate of 2.95%, tracking the historical relationship between wage inflation and CPI.

Starting salary (1985)$35,900Equiv. purchasing power to $115,000 today
Ending salary (2025)$115,000Nominal dollars
Wage growth (CAGR)2.95% / yearHistorical CPI-linked growth
Career span41 years (1985–2025)Inclusive
Investment returnActual S&P 500Total return incl. dividends reinvested
Withdrawal strategy4% annual ruleApplied to each portfolio independently

Real wage growth over this period was just 19% in inflation-adjusted terms — roughly 0.44% annually. The nominal growth figure, however, compounds into a meaningfully larger ending salary. This reflects the well-documented stagnation of median wages across most of the income distribution over the past four decades.

Social Security: The Foundation

Social Security remains the most durable income source in retirement — longevity-protected, inflation-adjusted, and largely tax-advantaged at the state level. The benefit is calculated using the SSA's progressive formula applied to 41 years of indexed earnings.

AIME$10,703Avg indexed monthly earnings
Benefit at FRA (age 67)$3,573Per month, pre-tax
Benefit at age 70$4,431Maximum — 24% enhancement
Claiming strategy note

Each year of delay beyond FRA increases the benefit by 8%, permanently. Delaying from 67 to 70 adds $858/month. For someone in average health at 67, the actuarial case for delay is strong — breakeven is approximately 11–12 years.

Benefit by claiming age

Claiming ageAdjustmentMonthlyAnnualvs. FRA
Age 62 (earliest)−30%$2,501$30,012−$1,072/mo
Age 65−13.3%$3,096$37,152−$477/mo
Age 67 (FRA) ★$3,573$42,876baseline
Age 70 (maximum)+24%$4,431$53,172+$858/mo

401(k) vs. IRA: The Payroll Tax Question

A common misconception is that contributing to a 401(k) rather than an IRA reduces your Social Security benefit because it lowers your reported wages. The reality is more nuanced — and for this income level, the SS outcome is identical under both strategies.

How each vehicle appears on your W-2

Traditional 401(k)
Box 1 — Federal wagesSalary − deferral ↓
Box 3 — SS wagesFull gross salary ✓
Box 5 — Medicare wagesFull gross salary ✓
FICA taxOn full gross wages
NJ state wagesSalary − deferral ↓
Traditional IRA
Box 1 — Federal wagesFull gross salary
Box 3 — SS wagesFull gross salary ✓
Box 5 — Medicare wagesFull gross salary ✓
FICA taxOn full gross wages
NJ state wagesFull gross (no NJ deduction)
Roth 401(k)
Box 1 — Federal wagesFull gross salary
Box 3 — SS wagesFull gross salary ✓
Box 5 — Medicare wagesFull gross salary ✓
FICA taxOn full gross wages
NJ state wagesFull gross (post-tax)

The numbers confirm it — all identical

Metric401(k)Traditional IRADifference
Portfolio value (end 2025)$1,379,330$1,379,330$0
Total FICA paid (career)$213,695$213,695$0
SS taxable wages (lifetime)Full grossFull gross$0
AIME$10,703/mo$10,703/mo$0
PIA at age 67 (FRA)$3,573/mo$3,573/moIdentical ✓
Income tax deduction (career)$43,352$43,352$0
The one real difference — New Jersey

NJ allows a 401(k) deferral to be excluded from gross income on the state return, reducing NJ taxable wages. NJ does not allow a deduction for Traditional IRA contributions. This means a 401(k) saves both federal (22%) and NJ state (5.525%) tax in one step, while a Traditional IRA only saves federal income tax via the Form 1040 above-the-line deduction — the NJ state tax on that income is still paid.

In dollar terms for this scenario: both vehicles save the same $43,352 in federal tax over the career. The 401(k) additionally saves $8,676 in NJ state tax (5.525% × $157,500). The IRA investor pays that NJ tax regardless. This is the only mechanical difference between the two vehicles for a NJ resident — and it favors the 401(k).

Practical differences beyond this analysis

Contribution limits401(k): $23,500 (2025)vs. IRA: $7,000 — 3.4× higher ceiling
Employer match401(k) onlyTypical 50–100% of first 3–6% of salary — free money not modeled here
Investment choiceIRA: unlimited401(k) limited to plan menu; IRA has full market access
Creditor protection401(k): ERISA-protectedIRA protection varies by state
RMDsBoth: age 73Roth IRA has no RMDs; Roth 401(k) RMDs eliminated by SECURE 2.0
Early accessIRA more flexibleMore penalty exceptions; Roth basis always accessible

The IRA Accumulation Story

Maximum IRA contributions were made each year, invested at the actual S&P 500 total return. The IRS limit grew from $2,000 in 1985 to $7,000 in 2025, with meaningful increases in 2002, 2005, 2008, 2013, and 2019. The portfolio is identical under both Traditional and Roth structures — and identical to a 401(k) using the same dollar amounts.

Total contributed$157,50041 years of IRS-max contributions
Portfolio value (2025)$1,379,330Actual S&P 500 returns
Return multiple8.76×Every dollar grew to $8.76

The S&P 500's actual return path included severe drawdowns — 2002 (−22%), 2008 (−37%), and 2022 (−18%). Yet the full-career compounding effect is powerful: $157,500 in contributions became $1.38 million. The tax savings portfolio (Traditional deductions reinvested) added another $379,661 on top.

Traditional vs. Roth: The Central Question

Both strategies invest the same IRS-limit dollars in the same portfolio — the terminal value is identical. The only difference is tax timing. The Traditional deduction is taken at the marginal rate during working years; retirement withdrawals are taxed at the lower effective rate.

Working year marginal rate27.525% combined22% federal + 5.525% NJ on each contribution
Retirement effective rate10.5% combined10% federal + 0.5% NJ effective
Marginal–effective spread17 percentage pointsThe engine of the Traditional advantage
Roth extra out-of-pocket$43,352 moreNo deduction — full contribution is after-tax cost

After-tax terminal values and monthly income

ComponentTraditional + SavingsRoth IRA
IRA portfolio value$1,379,330$1,379,330
Less: retirement tax on IRA($144,829) at 10.5%$0
IRA after-tax value$1,234,501$1,379,330
Tax savings portfolio$379,661
Less: cap gains (15%)($56,949)
Savings portfolio after-tax$322,712
Combined after-tax value$1,557,212$1,379,330
IRA monthly income (4%)$4,115$4,598
Savings monthly income (4%)$1,076
Combined spendable monthly ★$5,191$4,598
Verdict

When tax savings are reinvested, the Traditional IRA produces $593/month more in spendable income ($7,116/year). The 27.525% marginal deduction applied to $157,500 in contributions generates $379,661 in additional compounded wealth by retirement. Even after paying 10.5% effective tax on IRA withdrawals and 15% cap gains on the savings portfolio, the Traditional investor is materially ahead.

If the savings portfolio is managed within the 0% long-term capital gains bracket (income below ~$48,350 single), the advantage widens further to approximately $648/month.

Total Retirement Income Picture

Combining Social Security at FRA, IRA withdrawals under the 4% rule, and the tax savings portfolio produces the following gross annual income.

Annual income by source (Traditional strategy)

Social Security
$42,876
IRA withdrawals (4%)
$55,173
Tax savings portfolio (4%)
$15,441
Total gross
$113,490 / year  ·  $9,458 / month

After-tax income by state of residence

FL / TX / NV (no state tax) ~$8,370 / mo Saves only ~$67/mo vs. NJ. NJ's retirement exclusions already reduce state tax to near-zero. Real NJ burden is in working years.
PA resident ~$8,050 / mo PA taxes retirement income at 3.07% flat with limited exclusions — worse than NJ for this income level.
Optimized federal + no state ~$8,550 / mo Roth conversions, tax-loss harvesting, and 0% cap gains bracket management can reduce federal effective rate to ~7%.

Key Findings & Takeaways

1 — The portfolio did the heavy lifting, not income growth

$35,900 in 1985 grew to $115,000 today — but in real terms that's only a 19% gain over 40 years. The S&P 500 turned $157,500 in contributions into $1.38 million. Investment return, not salary growth, is the primary driver of retirement wealth.

2 — Traditional wins when tax savings are reinvested

The critical variable is what happens to the annual tax refund. Invested in a taxable S&P 500 account, the Traditional strategy produces $593/month more spendable income than Roth. The 17-point spread between marginal working rate (27.5%) and effective retirement rate (10.5%) is the source of this advantage.

3 — 401(k) and IRA produce identical SS benefits and FICA obligations

Neither vehicle reduces Social Security taxable wages. Both 401(k) deferrals and IRA contributions leave Box 3 (SS wages) on the W-2 unchanged — FICA is calculated on full gross wages either way. The AIME, PIA, and SS benefit are identical: $3,573/month at FRA. The portfolio outcome is also identical for the same dollar amounts contributed.

4 — The one real NJ difference: 401(k) saves state tax; IRA does not

New Jersey excludes 401(k) deferrals from state gross income, saving 5.525% on each dollar deferred. NJ does not allow a Traditional IRA deduction. Over this career, that difference amounts to ~$8,676 in additional NJ tax savings that the 401(k) captures and the IRA does not — a meaningful but modest advantage.

5 — NJ is more retiree-friendly than its reputation suggests

NJ fully exempts Social Security, exempts up to $75,000 of pension and IRA income for single filers under $150,000, and produces an effective state retirement tax rate of approximately 0.5%. Relocating to a no-state-tax state saves only ~$67/month at this income level. The real NJ tax burden falls during working years.

6 — Social Security timing is the highest guaranteed return available

Delaying from age 62 to 70 adds $1,930/month in permanent, inflation-adjusted, longevity-protected income. The 8%/year delayed credit is unmatched by any guaranteed financial instrument. For anyone in reasonable health at 67, maximizing the delay is likely optimal.

7 — The 4% rule on this portfolio produces a comfortable retirement

Combined gross income of $113,490/year produces net after-tax take-home of $8,303/month as a NJ resident — well above median retirement income. The effective tax rate on this income is just 12.2%, reflecting the favorable treatment of SS income and retirement account distributions.


Complete Assumptions Reference

Career period1985–2025 (41 years)
Starting / ending salary$35,900 → $115,000
Wage CAGR2.95%
ContributionMaximum IRS IRA limit each year
Investment returnActual S&P 500 total return by year
Tax savings reinvestmentSame S&P 500 returns; invested at year-start
Federal working marginal rate22%
NJ working marginal rate5.525%
Federal retirement effective rate10.0% on IRA withdrawals
NJ retirement effective rate0.5% (near-zero — SS exempt + $75k exclusion)
Cap gains rate (savings portfolio)15% long-term (conservative)
FICA rate7.65% employee share (6.2% OASDI + 1.45% Medicare)
Withdrawal rate4% annually (rule of 4%)
SS benefitFRA age 67; actual SSA formula
2025 SS bend points$1,226 / $7,391
2025 standard deduction (single)$15,750 + $2,000 age 65+ + partial senior bonus
Employer matchNot modeled
Fees / expense ratiosNot modeled — gross index returns used

Questions about your own retirement strategy?

Every situation is different. Let's run the numbers for yours.